Smartasses of the world unite!!

Generally a smartass and believer in the Twainism that Against the assualt of laughter, nothing can stand. Mission: mock bigotry, narcisism, and ignorance. This is a collection of thoughts on baseball, politics, economics, and occasional other things.

Follow me on Twitter
Showing posts with label World War I. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World War I. Show all posts

Monday, November 12, 2018

Nationalism.....what is it good for?



Today is Veteran's Day (observed). The actual day was yesterday the 11th of November. It's the mark of a day of great importance. Veteran's Day began as Armistice Day. It's still called that in many countries. Canada has named it Remembrance Day. The Armistice ending WWI was signed on 11/11/1918, and was the original cause to be marked that we now call Veteran's Day. Veteran's Day has become a day to pay tribute to those who served in the Armed Forces, as it should. Men and women take oaths, and devote years of life, time away from family, and risk of death to defend their country. The holiday's roots are in the end of WWI, and that's important to remember.

World War I has been called the "seminal tragedy." It marked the end of the old order, and gave birth to the new order that led to the 20th Century, and all of its mad made cataclysm. All that cataclysm made so many more veteran's to salute on Veteran's Day/Armistice Day/Remembrance Day; so many more casualties to remember in tribute on Memorial Day. All of them were fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters. So many of them came from working class families, or families of immigrants, upper class families, and poor families. They all deserve to be honored for taking the oath, manning a post, and sacrificing. What were the roots or war and conflict that demanded their sacrifice? We owe it to them, and present and future servicemen and service women, to assure that sacrifice is given for a just cause.

The causes of WWI are well studied. It was still the time, in the early 20th century, or empires, monarchy, and an established order of aristocratic elites that dominated the international order. Save for the young United States, and France all major powers were monarchies. All major powers had overseas colonies, and sought to exploit them for economic wealth to the home country, Even the United States, had overseas "territories" like the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Guam, acquired mostly from the settlement of its win in the Spanish American War. The British crown ruled a long established maritime empire. France had colonies in North Africa, and East Asia, and sought to maintain itself as a major land power in Europe,. A comparatively young German Empire, under a young Kaiser Wilhelm II, was new to the colonial era, but aggressively was amassing a navy to rival England's. Austria Hungary was the modern empire of Hapsburgs, the dynasty that had dominated central Europe since the fall of Napoleon 100 years before..The Russian Czar held domain over the most expansive land empire in the world. The Ottoman Empire still commanded the Caliphate, and though it had been pushed out of Europe, it still held dominion over the lucrative overland routes to Persia.

The common cancer throughout the world was nationalism. Germany sought it's place in the sun. Germans saw themselves, by virtue of their leading role in science, academia, technology, and most powerful land army, as who should be first among nations. England ruled the seas, controlled vast colonial resources that fed it's industrial output, and London was the financial center of the world. England did not intend for its economic, and naval dominance be compromised. France was France. It saw itself as the center of culture, and art, and civilization. It birthed the Enlightenment. The Rights Of Man were authored there. It was the heir to the legacy of Napoleon, and it's grand past meant it should be the dominant power in Europe.

All of this nationalism came to its head in August 1914. It is, in my view, the great unlearned lesson. For even The Great War that followed, and the veterans it created, did not address it. The peace of the Treaty of Versailles did not quell it. It only justified the nationalism of the Allied victors, and suppressed the nationalism of it's losers, beneath - as if it would stay there in perpetuity. When it finally did come back, it wore the face of Fascism, and Aryan supremacy seeking to establish its dominance. Millions more veterans were created. The Versailles Peace ignored, and disrespected, the budding nationalism of the expanding Japanese Empire. It's assertion in the Pacific created the need for even more veterans.

The peace of 1945 quelled nationalism for a time. An international order held sway as Capitalism held off Communism for 50+ years, and while veterans were still created, it was not on the order of the tens of millions of the World Wars.

Now nationalism is back. Many, many voices flock behind a demagogue who says "My country first!" They see the threat to national preeminence, and his promise to fight that threat. To fight back all the "others" that seek to parasitically feed off of it. But you see, it's all short sighted. It ignores the history that "My country first!" has created. The veterans created by it that, really, should be eating dinner with their families, and going to kids softball/baseball/basketball games. We have it in our power to choose to let nationalism die. A patriot is proud of their country when it does good things. A nationalist thinks whatever their great, even when it, objectively, does bad things. We owe it to all veterans that their sacrifices are offered for truly honorable things.

Monday, September 1, 2014

History Channel - this is how you do history.

I have really enjoyed The History Channel. It has produced many excellent multi-episode shows about The French Revolution, Man: The Story of Us, The Men Who Built America, and a series on all American Presidents, to now American Pickers, Pawn Stars, American Restoration. They're all good show, but come on, is Big Hoss getting a sweet deal on Clark Gable's condom box really history? Steve McQueen is the coolest guy of ever-all time, but Rick Harris's man-boner for all things McQueen is getting old, and I don't care if Frank gets the goddamn enamel Standard Oil sign for a good price either. History Channel has become another piece that celebrates consumerism. It just focused on history and pop culture.

If you want good history, you need to go to the American Heroes Channel. I know, what a dumbass name for a channel, but it's history programming is aces. The latest piece of history-wood inducing programming is the multi episode Apocalypse WWI.

It's 4 one hour episodes did an excellent job of going beyond the conventional narrative. Each episode is built around one year. The first episode centers on 1914, and focused mainly on the politics of the period in regards to the interrelations of the English, Russian, and German monarchies. It touches on the shaky nature of the Austrian Empire regarding the various slavic ethnicities. Lastly the heavy role of nationalism throughout European nations goes a long way toward explaining how the assassination of an heir would spiral from regional political quarrel to a full blown global conflict. If the lesson of WWII is the folly of appeasement, then the lesson of WWI is its contrary, the rush to fight for national pride.

The final episode is excellent in its exposition of the nationalism, and need to punish the Central belligerents, that pollutes the conditions Treaty of Versailles, and other peace accords, as a harbinger of what is to come. In the century since WWI we have emphasized the lessons of WWII, and lost sight of the lessons of WWI.

Santayana was right - over and over.

Saturday, June 28, 2014

It's been 100 years

June 28, 1914 the first domino was tipped. Dominoes from that that first historical domino, and the imperceptibly long domino chain that followed are still toppling today. Arch Duke Ferdinand was shot by Gavrilo Princip in Sarajevo triggering World War I. It's history we've heard over and over, but unlike World War II, World War I is comparatively under studied, under discussed, and under investigated. Consider what would not have happened without World War I.

Without World War I, and the Treaty of Versailles is the rise of Hitler, and the Nazis in post war Europe possible?
If the Nazis don't ascend, does WWII become less likely?
Without WWI does Germany return the exiled Lenin to Russia to threaten the already weak Czar?
If Lenin does not return to Russia is there a Bolshevik Revolution?
With no Bolshevik Revolution, is there a different end to the Russian Czar?
Without WWI and the treaties defining its end, do Japan, and to a lesser extent, Italy, get the shaft as victors with no spoils?
Without hurt national pride to Italy and Japan begin their quest for empire?
Again, does this make WWII less likely?
Without WWI how does the end of the Ottoman Empire come about? Do the Ottomans crumble organically, as they had been, and then what does the Middle East look like if its borders are the result of its own regional political dynamics as opposed to the benefit of France and England as they drew them at the end of WWI?

None of this is to say WWI would never have happened. Europe in the early 20th Century was a tinder box of nationalism, competition among royals, as well as regional and ethnic strife. But we don't study the "War to end all wars" the way we study World War II. World War I was the beginning of the end of monarchies as a heads of state. It saw the end of the Russian Czar, German Kaiser, Ottoman Sultan, Austrian Emperor, as well as the dwindling importance of the English Crown.

Where are the movies about the soldiers, and generals that fought WWI? It's been easy to romanticize WWII. Villains are obvious, making the heroes just as obvious. WWI is not so easy to romanticize into conventional stories. The bad guys are not so obviously bad. The Arch-Duke whose assassination sparked it all was not a loved royal figure whose assassination was unforeseen. The Kaiser wasn't particularly evil and tyrannical. If we spent more time learning the lessons of WWI, and less time over learning, and misapplying the lessons of WWII we'd be in a better spot.